Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466771›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Overlapping community detection in weighted networks via hierarchical clustering.

Petr Prokop, Pavla Dráždilová, Jan Platoš

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petr ProkopDepartment of Computer Science, FEECS, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5881-2779
Pavla DráždilováDepartment of Computer Science, FEECS, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jan PlatošDepartment of Computer Science, FEECS, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In real-world networks, community structures often appear as tightly connected clusters of nodes, with recent studies suggesting a hierarchical organization where larger groups subdivide into smaller ones across different levels. This hierarchical structure is particularly complex in trade networks, where actors typically belong to multiple communities due to diverse business relationships and contracts. To address this complexity, we present a novel algorithm for detecting hierarchical structures of overlapping communities in weighted networks, focusing on the interdependency between internal and external quality metrics for evaluating the detected communities. The proposed Graph Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (GHAC) approach utilizes maximal cliques as the basis units for hierarchical clustering. The algorithm measures dissimilarities between clusters using the minimal closed trail distance (CT-distance) and the size of maximal cliques within overlaps, capturing the density and connectivity of nodes. Through extensive experiments on synthetic networks with known ground truth, we demonstrate that the adjusted Silhouette index is the most reliable internal metric for determining the optimal cut in the dendrogram. Experimental results indicate that the GHAC method is competitive with widely used community detection techniques, particularly in networks with highly overlapping communities. The method effectively reveals the hierarchical structure of communities in weighted networks, as demonstrated by its application to the OECD weighted trade network, which describes the balanced trade value of bilateral trade relations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID39466771
PMCPMC11515960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.