ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2025
On the Relative Effects of Wall and Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Material Properties in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress.
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Pathomechanics, Current Understanding and Emerging Directions: A Perspective for 2025 and Beyond.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAn abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dilation localized in the infrarenal segment of the abdominal aorta that can expand continuously and rupture if left untreated. Computational methods such as finite element analysis (FEA) are widely used with in silico models to calculate biomechanical predictors of rupture risk while choosing constitutive material properties for the AAA wall and intraluminal thrombus (ILT).
methodsIn the present work, we investigated the effect of different constitutive material properties for the wall and ILT on 21 idealized and 10 unruptured patient-specific AAA geometries. Three material properties were used to characterize the wall and two for the ILT, leading to six material model combinations for each AAA geometry subject to appropriate boundary conditions.
resultsThe results of the FEA simulations indicate significant differences in the average peak wall stress (PWS), 99th percentile wall stress (99th WS), and spatially averaged wall stress (SAWS) for all AAA geometries subject to the choice of a material model combination. Specifically, using a material model combination with a compliant ILT yielded statistically higher wall stresses compared to using a stiff ILT, irrespective of the constitutive equation used to model the AAA wall. DISCUSSION: This work provides quantitative insight into the variability of the wall stress distributions ensuing from AAA FEA modeling due to its strong dependency on population-averaged soft tissue material characterizations. This dependency leads to uncertainty about the true biomechanical state of stress of an individual AAA and the subsequent assessment of its rupture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.