ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
IORT-photon boost plus hypofractionated whole breast irradiation in patients with breast cancer after primary systemic treatment: feasibility, safety and clinical results.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess for the first time the safety and feasibility of combining photon-intraoperative radiotherapy (ph-IORT) with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (h-WBI) in patients referred to primary systemic therapy (PST).
methodsFrom March 2019 to December 2020, patients referred for breast conservative surgery (BCS) after PST in our institution were prospectively included in the present trial. PST was prescribed to all patients according the ESMO-SEOM guidelines. Once the PST was completed, BCS was discussed in the multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). 20 Gy were prescribed to the surface of the applicator of an Intrabeam®photon-IORT during BCS. h-WBI (40.5 Gy/2.67 Gy/15frx) was planned to be administered 3-5w after BCS. All patients were treated with hWBI VMAT-Rapid-Arc&Daily Exac-Trac-IGRT. The primary end points of the study were feasibility and safety (grade 3 toxicity rate CTCAE.5.0-scale) of the proposed treatment protocol. The secondary end points included cosmetic results (Harvard Scale), local relapse rate and overall survival.
resultsThirty-five patients were included in the trial. The median age was 54 years. Tumor size was > 2 cm in all cases. Eighteen patients were N + (51.4%). There was no disease progression during PST. All patients received the planned 20 Gy-ph-IORT boost at the time of BCS and the proposed h-WBI. 31/35 (88,6%) patients started h-WBI within the predefined time period (3-5w after BCS). No patient showed ≥ G3 acute toxicity 3 months after the end of h-WBI. No ≥ G3 late toxicity was observed at 12 months of follow-up and thereafter. Cosmetic results were scored excellent/good in 26 patients (74.2%). After a median follow-up of 52 months, a TNBC patient locally relapsed at 13 months of follow-up.
conclusionWe demonstrated for the first time that ph-IORT + hWBI is feasible and safe in patients referred to BCS after PST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39466580What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.