ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Large vessel vasculitis evaluation by CTA: impact of deep-learning reconstruction and "dark blood" technique.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing vascular wall assessment in computed tomography: image quality optimization via small-field-of-view vascular wall spectral images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the performance of the "dark blood" (DB) technique, deep-learning reconstruction (DLR), and their combination on aortic images for large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty patients diagnosed with LVV scheduled for aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) were prospectively recruited in a single center. Arterial and delayed-phase images of the aorta were reconstructed using the hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and DLR algorithms. HIR or DLR DB image sets were generated using corresponding arterial and delayed-phase image sets based on a "contrast-enhancement-boost" technique. Quantitative parameters of aortic wall image quality were evaluated.
resultsCompared to the arterial phase image sets, decreased image noise and increased signal-noise-ratio (SNR) and CNR
conclusionDB CTA improves image quality and provides better visualization of the aorta for the LVV aorta vessel wall. The DB technique reconstructed by the DLR algorithm achieved the best overall performance compared with the other image sequences. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep-learning-based "dark blood" images improve vessel wall image wall quality and boundary visualization. KEY POINTS: Dark blood CTA improves image quality and provides better aortic wall visualization. Deep-learning CTA presented higher quality and subjective scores compared to HIR. Combination of dark blood and deep-learning reconstruction obtained the best overall performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.