ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Long-term pulmonary repair in rat lungs after sublobar resection: electrocautery versus stapler methods.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated and compared the long-term (6-month) histologic changes in a rat model of sublobar resection created using electrocautery or stapler techniques.
methodsNine-week-old male rats were anesthetized and intubated; thoracotomy with sublobar resection was performed in the right middle lobe using electrocautery or stapler techniques. Histological examination was performed at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post-surgery to assess long-term effects on lung tissue repair and morphologic changes. Lung expansion and alveolar epithelial cell proliferation were evaluated by measuring the mean linear intercept and counting the number of alveolar type I and II cells.
resultsThe electrocautery group showed signs of lung self-repair at the resected area over time, with inflammatory cell infiltration followed by growth of vessels and bronchioles. Mesothelial cells covered the resected area by 2 weeks; elastic fibers gradually connected from both sides by 24 weeks. Lung expansion, measured by mean linear intercept, was initially small below the electrocautery resection area at 2 weeks but recovered from 4 to 24 weeks. The stapler group showed persistently small mean linear intercept over time. In the electrocautery group, the number of alveolar type II cells was higher just below the resection than in other areas from 2 to 24 weeks, followed by alveolar type I cells (4 to 24 weeks). The stapler group showed a transient alveolar type II cell increase at 2 weeks.
conclusionsCompared to the stapler technique, electrocautery may provide advantages for postoperative lung repair by promoting lung expansion and alveolar epithelial cell proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.