ArticleSpine deformity2025
Spine deformity surgery in patients with Beals syndrome can be effectively performed but does risk revision surgery.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBeals syndrome or congenital contractual arachnodactyly is a rare disorder characterized by multiple joint contractures, Marfanoid body habitus and crumpled ears and has been associated with scoliosis. This study reports a clinical series of patients with Beals syndrome who have had surgical treatment for their spinal deformity.
methodsA retrospective review of all patients at a single institution who had a genetically-confirmed diagnosis of Beals syndrome and had surgical treatment for their scoliosis were reviewed for surgical outcome and complications.
resultsThere were eight patients who had surgery at an average age of 11.5 years, four were female and four had cardiovascular abnormalities requiring treatment. The preoperative coronal Cobb was 82.3° which improved to 42.1°(46.8% correction), and 46.5° (43.5% correction) at final follow-up. Preoperative halo-gravity-traction was used in three patients. Three patients had a posterior instrumentation and fusion (PSFI), 2 a combined anterior/PSFI, 1 had tethering, 1 with PSFI with posteriorly-approached discectomy, and 1 with a PSFI and vertebral column resection. One of the eight patients had a critical intraoperative neuromonitoring event but was normal following appropriate responses and no patient awoke with neurologic deficits. Two had an unplanned return to the operating room for implant dislodgement and each had a successful revision.
conclusionsScoliosis associated with Beals syndrome can have large curves at the time of surgery and require a variety of surgical approaches to achieve a good result. Revision surgery with return to the operating room is necessary in 25% of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39466540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.