ArticleJournal of medical systems2024
An Artificial Intelligent System for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Whole Slide Images.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalizability of a biopsy-trained artificial intelligence algorithm to TURP and HoLEP specimens for detection of incidental prostate adenocarcinoma.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- High-sensitivity Raman spectroscopy for prostate cancer detection and tissue extraction guidance.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Deep learning for predicting pituitary neuroendocrine tumour lineage and high-risk subtypes from histology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Computational pathology-based artificial intelligence platform for the identification of common oral potentially malignant disorders.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Prediction of chemoresistance in ovarian cancer based on deep learning with pathological images.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Development of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system for routine gastric biopsy diagnosis.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Multimodal system for automated medical documentation and clinical decision support integrating contact center solutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid follicular neoplasms on multiscale intraoperative frozen pathological images: A multicenter diagnostic study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Utilization of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection: a comprehensive review of innovations in screening and diagnosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years a significant demand to develop computer-assisted diagnostic tools to assess prostate cancer using whole slide images has been observed. In this study we develop and validate a machine learning system for cancer assessment, inclusive of detection of perineural invasion and measurement of cancer portion to meet clinical reporting needs. The system analyses the whole slide image in three consecutive stages: tissue detection, classification, and slide level analysis. The whole slide image is divided into smaller regions (patches). The tissue detection stage relies upon traditional machine learning to identify WSI patches containing tissue, which are then further assessed at the classification stage where deep learning algorithms are employed to detect and classify cancer tissue. At the slide level analysis stage, entire slide level information is generated by aggregating all the patch level information of the slide. A total of 2340 haematoxylin and eosin stained slides were used to train and validate the system. A medical team consisting of 11 board certified pathologists with prostatic pathology subspeciality competences working independently in 4 different medical centres performed the annotations. Pixel-level annotation based on an agreed set of 10 annotation terms, determined based on medical relevance and prevalence, was created by the team. The system achieved an accuracy of 99.53% in tissue detection, with sensitivity and specificity respectively of 99.78% and 99.12%. The system achieved an accuracy of 92.80% in classifying tissue terms, with sensitivity and specificity respectively 92.61% and 99.25%, when 5x magnification level was used. For 10x magnification, these values were respectively 91.04%, 90.49%, and 99.07%. For 20x magnification they were 84.71%, 83.95%, 90.13%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.