ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Pericardial adhesion and performance of hemodynamically significant constrictive pericarditis using cine magnetic resonance feature tracking.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the diagnostic performance of cine magnetic resonance feature tracking (FT) for pericardial adhesions and hemodynamically significant constrictive pericarditis (CP). This retrospective study included patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging between 2011 and 2021. Twenty-four patients (median age, 73 years; seven females) suspected of having CP and undergoing CMR were selected (CP group). Age-matched 24 participants with heart failure (HF) and 24 healthy volunteers were also analyzed. The FT method assessed septal bounce, the presence of a dip or plateau pattern, and pericardial adhesions. The diagnostic performance, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for hemodynamically significant CP, was evaluated against catheterization results, and the adhesion detection in the combined CP and HF control was based on cine tagging or surgical records. Septal bounce was detected in 54% (13/24) of the patients by FT and 38% (9/24) of the patients by visual evaluation in the CP group but not in the HF or normal group (p < 0.001). To detect hemodynamically significant CP, the sensitivity and specificity of each finding were as follows: septal bounce, 85% (11/13) and 82% (9/11); adhesion, 100% (13/13) and 9% (1/11); dip, 77% (10/13) and 36% (4/11); and plateau, 69% (9/13) and 46% (5/11), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of pericardial adhesion detection using FT and visual evaluation were 96% (23/24) and 100% (24/24), respectively, and the AUCs were 0.998 and 0.999, respectively. CMR-FT demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing hemodynamically significant CP and pericardial adhesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39466497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.