ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024
CAR T-cell Therapy for Central Nervous System Lymphoma.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Frontline CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy combined with targeted regimens induces durable complete remission in newly diagnosed secondary CNS lymphoma: a report of two cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Whole brain radiotherapy combined with CART-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory central nervous system B-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Relapsed or refractory central nervous system lymphoma successfully treated by glofitamab combined with lenalidomide.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWhile anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy represents a major advance in systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas have been excluded from pivotal trials because of the fear of neurotoxicity. The purpose of this review was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of CAR T-cells in CNS lymphomas based on recently published studies. RECENT
findingsAll the studies on CAR T-cell therapy for both primary and secondary CNS lymphomas reported high response rates (complete response rates ranging from 32 to 67%) in highly pre-treated patients. One-year PFS reached 40 to 60% in several studies. Neurotoxicity occurred in 36 to 68% of patients, including grade 3-4 neurotoxicity in 4.5 to 29% of patients. CAR T-cell therapy appears to be a very promising treatment in CNS lymphomas, with efficacy results close to those observed in systemic lymphomas. The toxicity profile, notably regarding neurotoxicity, is reassuring and should not prevent the development of CAR T-cells in the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39466477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.