ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for assessment of MRI abnormality at term equivalent age in low-birth-weight infants weighing less than 1500 g.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at term equivalent age (TEA) are useful for assessment of major abnormalities revealed by MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsOf 405 neonates who underwent MRI during the period 2016-2022, 101 low birth weight (LBW) infants (birth weight < 1500 g) were imaged at TEA. ADC values were measured in the thalamus, basal ganglia, anterior and posterior centrum semiovale, pons, and cerebellar hemisphere. The ADC values in LBW infants with and without major abnormalities evident on MRI were compared at the above six sites. Abnormal findings included IVH-3 IVH-4, more than six punctate white matter lesion, white matter injury (cystic or non-cystic), and major cerebellar hemorrhage. LBW infants overall (N = 101) and an extreme LBW (ELBW) group (< 1000 g) (N = 55) were compared and area under the curve was calculated using ROC analysis.
resultThere were no difference in ADC values between LBW infants with and without major abnormalities. In ELBW infants, ADC values in the cerebellum were higher when major abnormalities were present (p = 0.045). ROC analysis yielded AUC < 0.7 for both LBW cases overall and ELBW cases.
conclusionFor LBW infants overall, ADC measurements alone at TEA are not very useful for differentiation between individuals with and without major abnormalities, but ELBW infants with major abnormalitiesshowed higher ADC values in the cerebellum, suggesting that the normal reduction of ADC occurring with maturation between preterm birth and TEA may be impaired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39466355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.