Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466332›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy- a retrospective comparative study of 99 pregnant and 1796 non-pregnant women.

Michael Hoffmann, L Anthuber, A Herebia da Silva, A Mair, S Wolf, C Dannecker, M Anthuber, M Schrempf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. michael.hoffmann@uk-augsburg.de.
L AnthuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
A Herebia da SilvaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
A MairDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
S WolfDepartment of General, Visceral and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, City Hospital Bad Toelz, Schützenstrasse 15, 83646, Bad Toelz, Germany.
C DanneckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
M AnthuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
M SchrempfDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuspected appendicitis is the most common indication for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Diagnosis and management of these patients can be challenging. Atypical clinical presentation has been described before, but the current literature consists mostly of small case series. Therefore, we conducted a large retrospective study to analyze the frequency and diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs, laboratory findings and imaging modalities in pregnant woman undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis compared to a control group of non-pregnant women of childbearing age. We further describe intra- and postoperative findings in both groups.

methodsData from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy were retrieved from the electronic patient database and analyzed. Preoperative clinical, laboratory and imaging findings as well as intra- and postoperative characteristics were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant women.

resultsBetween January 2008 and June 2023, 99 pregnant woman and 1796 non-pregnant woman between the ages of 16 and 49 underwent emergency surgery for suspected appendicitis. Pregnant women were less likely to have right lower quadrant tenderness (p = 0.002), guarding (p = 0.011) and rebound tenderness (p = 0.097). A greater percentage of pregnant women had a symptom duration of more than 24 h before presentation (p = 0.003) Abdominal ultrasound showed a reduced diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women (p = 0.004). MRI was used in eight pregnant women and showed a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Pregnant women had a longer operating time (p = 0.006), a higher rate of open appendectomies or conversion (p < 0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (3.2 days vs. 2.2 days, p < 0.001). The perforation rate was also higher in pregnant women at 16% vs. 10% (p = 0.048).

conclusionThe diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy presents a challenge for the clinician. Our data confirm the paradigm of "atypical presentation" which should lead to an extended diagnostic workup. Ultrasound showed less diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women in our study. MRI is a useful tool to reduce uncertainty and the rate of negative appendectomies.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisPregnancy ComplicationsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAppendicitisEmergency surgeryNegative appendectomyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39466332
PMCPMC11519162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.