ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024
The Evolution of Health Information Technology for Enhanced Patient-Centric Care in the United States: Data-Driven Descriptive Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trust and Technology Acceptance: Comparing Traditional Search Engines and Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Information Seeking.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Performance Measurement and Management in Child and Adolescent Healthcare Services.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Are Traditional Registries Becoming Obsolete in the Modern Digital Health Ecosystem?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Enhancing Care Coordination and Patient Engagement Through Electronic Medical Record Utilization in Primary Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Electronic Medical Record Attitudes and Predictors of Adoption Among Ethiopian Health Professionals: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- MS360°: a conceptual digital-first, data-driven hybrid care framework for personalised multiple sclerosis management.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Applying the ORBIT model to design a patient-facing mHealth app for diabetes prevention in urban primary care: translating patient perspectives into app design.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Cocreating Principles for Digital Health Equity: Cross-Sectional, Qualitative Study for Participatory Human-Centered Design in Catalonia.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Healthcare-Seeking Preferences Among Patients in County Medical Consortium in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Impact of Health Care Policies on Patient Portal Adoption and Engagement in US Hospitals: Trends From 2012 to 2024.Advances in health information science and practice · 2026Article
- Effects of digital literacy and nursing informatics competency as job resources on nurses' burnout and work engagement: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Global burden and inequalities of drug use disorders from 1990 to 2021 with projections to 2036.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Exploring community pharmacy manager/ pharmacist perceptions and responses to China's dual-channel policy for improving access and rational use of innovative drugs: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Bicentric evaluation of employee satisfaction, patient safety and treatment quality: comparing different Health Information System (HIS) solutions.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Developing a SNOMED CT-Based Value Set to Document Symptoms and Diagnoses for Adverse Drug Events: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- The Rise of Clinical Decision Support Algorithms in Pain Management 2009-2024.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) on Information Utilization for Decision-Making in the Routine Health Information System in Public Health Institutions of Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Development prospects of "Internet + medical and health services" in Shandong: application status and public acceptance.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Facilitator and Barrier to Health Information System Use from Health Professionals Perspective: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth information technology (health IT) has revolutionized health care in the United States through interoperable clinical care data exchange, e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and electronic patient access to health information.
objectiveThis study aims to examine progress in health IT adoption and its alignment with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ASTP's) mission to enhance health care through data access and exchange.
methodsThis study leverages data on end users of health IT to capture trends in engagement in interoperable clinical care data exchange (ability to find, send, receive, and integrate information from outside organizations), e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and capabilities to enable patient access to electronic health information. Data were primarily sourced from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey IT Supplement (2008 to 2023), Surescripts e-prescribing use data (2008 to 2023), the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (2014 to 2022), and the National Center for Health Statistics' National Electronic Health Records Survey (2009 to 2023).
resultsSince 2009, there has been a 10-fold increase in electronic health record (EHR) use among hospitals and a 5-fold increase among physicians. This enabled the interoperable exchange of electronic health information, e- prescribing, electronic public health data exchange, and the means for patients and their caregivers to access crucial personal health information digitally. As of 2023, 70% of hospitals are interoperable, with many providers integrated within EHR systems. Nearly all pharmacies and 92% of prescribers possess e-prescribing capabilities, an 85%-point increase since 2008. In 2013, 40% of hospitals and one-third of physicians allowed patients to view their online medical records. Patient access has improved, with 97% of hospitals and 65% of physicians possessing EHRs that enable patients to access their online medical records. As of 2022, three-fourths of individuals report being offered access to patient portals, and over half (57%) report engaging with their health information through their patient portal. Electronic public health reporting has also seen an increase, with most hospitals and physicians actively engaged in key reporting types.
conclusionsFederal incentives have contributed to the widespread adoption of EHRs and broad digitization in health care, while efforts to promote interoperability have encouraged collaboration across health care entities. As a result, interoperable clinical care data exchange, e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and patient access to health information have grown substantially over the past quarter century and have been shown to improve health care outcomes. However, interoperability hurdles, usability issues, data security concerns, and inequitable patient access persist. Addressing these issues will require collaborative efforts among stakeholders to promote data standardization, implement governance structures, and establish robust health information exchange networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.