Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466303›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Evolution of Health Information Technology for Enhanced Patient-Centric Care in the United States: Data-Driven Descriptive Study.

Wesley Barker, Wei Chang, Jordan Everson, Meghan Gabriel, Vaishali Patel, Chelsea Richwine, Catherine Strawley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wesley Barker *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7379-7220
Wei Chang *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4248-3816
Jordan Everson *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5355-6043
Meghan Gabriel *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-2169
Vaishali Patel *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-4428
Chelsea Richwine *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-3437
Catherine Strawley *Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-2745-287X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth information technology (health IT) has revolutionized health care in the United States through interoperable clinical care data exchange, e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and electronic patient access to health information.

objectiveThis study aims to examine progress in health IT adoption and its alignment with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ASTP's) mission to enhance health care through data access and exchange.

methodsThis study leverages data on end users of health IT to capture trends in engagement in interoperable clinical care data exchange (ability to find, send, receive, and integrate information from outside organizations), e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and capabilities to enable patient access to electronic health information. Data were primarily sourced from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey IT Supplement (2008 to 2023), Surescripts e-prescribing use data (2008 to 2023), the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (2014 to 2022), and the National Center for Health Statistics' National Electronic Health Records Survey (2009 to 2023).

resultsSince 2009, there has been a 10-fold increase in electronic health record (EHR) use among hospitals and a 5-fold increase among physicians. This enabled the interoperable exchange of electronic health information, e- prescribing, electronic public health data exchange, and the means for patients and their caregivers to access crucial personal health information digitally. As of 2023, 70% of hospitals are interoperable, with many providers integrated within EHR systems. Nearly all pharmacies and 92% of prescribers possess e-prescribing capabilities, an 85%-point increase since 2008. In 2013, 40% of hospitals and one-third of physicians allowed patients to view their online medical records. Patient access has improved, with 97% of hospitals and 65% of physicians possessing EHRs that enable patients to access their online medical records. As of 2022, three-fourths of individuals report being offered access to patient portals, and over half (57%) report engaging with their health information through their patient portal. Electronic public health reporting has also seen an increase, with most hospitals and physicians actively engaged in key reporting types.

conclusionsFederal incentives have contributed to the widespread adoption of EHRs and broad digitization in health care, while efforts to promote interoperability have encouraged collaboration across health care entities. As a result, interoperable clinical care data exchange, e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and patient access to health information have grown substantially over the past quarter century and have been shown to improve health care outcomes. However, interoperability hurdles, usability issues, data security concerns, and inequitable patient access persist. Addressing these issues will require collaborative efforts among stakeholders to promote data standardization, implement governance structures, and establish robust health information exchange networks.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsPatient-Centered CareElectronic Health RecordsElectronic PrescribingHealth Information InteroperabilityHumansUnited Stateselectronic health recordselectronic public health reportinge-prescribinghealth ITinteroperabilitypatient access to health information

Identifiers

PMID39466303
PMCPMC11555447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.