ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2025
HIV DNA Levels in Persons Who Acquired HIV in the Setting of Long-Acting Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention: Analysis of Cases from HPTN 083 and 084.
Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective HIV RNA screening with long-acting cabotegravir pre-exposure prophylaxis in HPTN 083.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- HIV diagnosis during acute infection: implications of long-acting preexposure prophylaxis and other evolving challenges.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated HIV DNA levels in individuals who received long-acting cabotegravir (CAB-LA) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) pre-exposure prophylaxis in the HPTN 083 and 084 trials and had HIV DNA testing performed to help determine HIV status. HIV DNA testing was performed using peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples collected after a reactive HIV test was obtained at a study site. DNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR (lower limit of detection [LLOD]: 4.09 copies/million PBMCs). Final HIV status and the timing of the first HIV-positive visit were determined by an independent adjudication committee based on HIV test results from real-time site testing and retrospective testing at a centralized laboratory. HIV DNA testing was performed for 133 participants [21 HIV-positive (7 CAB-LA arm, 14 TDF/FTC arm) and 112 HIV-negative; 1-6 tests/person]. For persons with HIV, the time between the first HIV-positive visit and collection of the first sample for DNA testing was a median of 81 days for those receiving CAB-LA (range 41-246) and 11 days for those receiving TDF/FTC (range 3-127). Four (57.1%) of the seven CAB-LA cases with infection had a low initial DNA result [three detected <LLOD; one near the LLOD (4.2 copies/10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.