Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466045›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Predictive Models for Sustained, Uncontrolled Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Hieu Minh Nguyen, William Anderson, Shih-Hsiung Chou, Andrew McWilliams, Jing Zhao, Nicholas Pajewski, Yhenneko Taylor

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hieu Minh NguyenCenter for Health System Sciences (CHASSIS), Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-6058
William AndersonStatistics and Data Management, Elanco, Greenfield, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-6718
Shih-Hsiung ChouEnterprise Data Management, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5414-1958
Andrew McWilliamsInformation Technology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3406-9201
Jing ZhaoGSCO Market Access Analytics and Real World Evidence, Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-0429
Nicholas PajewskiCenter for Health System Sciences (CHASSIS), Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4447-6196
Yhenneko TaylorCenter for Health System Sciences (CHASSIS), Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-5666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Assessing disease progression among patients with uncontrolled hypertension is important for identifying opportunities for intervention. Objective: We aim to develop and validate 2 models, one to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension (≥2 blood pressure [BP] readings ≥140/90 mm Hg or ≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) and one to predict hypertensive crisis (≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) within 1 year of an index visit (outpatient or ambulatory encounter in which an uncontrolled BP reading was recorded). Methods: Data from 142,897 patients with uncontrolled hypertension within Atrium Health Greater Charlotte in 2018 were used. Electronic health record-based predictors were based on the 1-year period before a patient's index visit. The dataset was randomly split (80:20) into a training set and a validation set. In total, 4 machine learning frameworks were considered: L2-regularized logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, gradient boosting machines, and random forest. Model selection was performed with 10-fold cross-validation. The final models were assessed on discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (eg, integrated calibration index), and net benefit (with decision curve analysis). Additionally, internal-external cross-validation was performed at the county level to assess performance with new populations and summarized using random-effect meta-analyses. Results: In internal validation, the C-statistic and integrated calibration index were 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.72) and 0.015 (95% CI 0.012-0.020) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) and 0.009 (95% CI 0.007-0.011) for the hypertensive crisis model. The models had higher net benefit than the default policies (ie, treat-all and treat-none) across different decision thresholds. In internal-external cross-validation, the pooled performance was consistent with internal validation results; in particular, the pooled C-statistics were 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.81) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model and hypertensive crisis model, respectively. Conclusions: An electronic health record-based model predicted hypertensive crisis reasonably well in internal and internal-external validations. The model can potentially be used to support population health surveillance and hypertension management. Further studies are needed to improve the ability to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHypertensionAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansHypertensive CrisisMachine LearningMaleMiddle Agedblood pressurecardiovasculardecision supportelectronic health recordmachine learningpredictive modelrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39466045
PMCPMC11533385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.