Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466007›Full record

ReviewChemPlusChem2025

Membrane Separations in Biomass Processing.

Anurag S Mandalika, Troy M Runge, Arthur J Ragauskas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemPlusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anurag S MandalikaAssistant Research Professor, Center for Energy Studies, Louisiana State University, 93 S Quad Dr, 1115, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.ORCID 0000-0003-3506-1332
Troy M RungeProfessor of Biological Systems Engineering and CALS Associate Dean for Research, 2121 Wisconsin Energy Institute Building, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1552 University Ave, Madison, WI 53726.
Arthur J RagauskasGovernor's Chair for Biorefining, Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831.

Funding

Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research DE-SC0018409National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture WIS03007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of integrated biorefineries and the greater utilization of biomass resources to reduce dependence on fossil fuel-derived products require research emphasis not just on conversion strategies but also on improving separations associated with biorefining. A significant roadblock towards developing biorefineries is the lack of effective separation techniques evidenced by the relative deficiency of literature in this area. Additionally, high conversion yields may only be realized if effective separations generate feedstock of sufficient purity - this makes research into biomass conversion strategies all the more critical. In this review, the challenges associated with biomass separations are discussed, followed by an overview of the most appropriate separation strategies for processing biomass. One of the unit operations most appealing for biorefining, membrane separations (MS), is then considered along with a review of the recent literature utilizing this technique in biomass processing.

Indexed as

BiomassMembranes, ArtificialMembranes, ArtificialBiofuelsBiomassBioprocessingMembranesSeparations

Identifiers

PMID39466007
PMCPMC11826140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.