Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465942›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Prescription time trends in patients with high-impact chronic pain: A National Patient Registry Study.

Karin D Bruun, Caroline T Thorarinsson, Henrik B Vaegter, Floor D Zegers, Bente M Nørgård, Mette Wod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karin D BruunPain Research Group, Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-2461
Caroline T ThorarinssonCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4236-5647
Henrik B VaegterPain Research Group, Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-9947
Floor D ZegersResearch Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-5332
Bente M NørgårdCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9514-3033
Mette WodCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-7321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-impact chronic pain (HICP), defined as chronic pain with a significant impact on daily function, affects approximately 8% of the Western population. In Denmark, HICP still remains to be described at the population level. Some patients with HICP are referred to the Danish pain centres, where they are registered with a procedural code. We conducted a nationwide registry-based study of all Danish patients registered with a visit to a pain centre from January 2005 to March 2022, to explore time trends in the prescription of analgesics and sedatives in this HICP subpopulation. Furthermore, data on socioeconomics and hospital diagnoses are reported.

methodsWe used data from the Central Person Registry, the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish National Prescription Registry, combined with data on socioeconomic information from Statistics Denmark. Data was collected on prescriptions 3 months before the first visit to a pain centre. Prescriptions were stratified into five calendar periods: before 2011, 2011-2013, 2014-2016, 2017-2019, and 2020-2022.

resultsWe identified 66,577 patients referred to a pain centre. Over 15 years, prescriptions before referral declined for opioids (from 53.2% to 31.7%), NSAIDs (from 28.3% to 23.5%), antidepressants (from 20.5% to 16.8%), anxiolytics (from 12.3% to 3.2%), and sleep medication (from 15.8% to 7.6%). In contrast, prescriptions increased for paracetamol (from 31.1% to 48.9%) and gabapentinoids (from 19.2% to 27.7%).

conclusionsIn patients with HICP visiting Danish pain centres, prescriptions before referral decreased for opioids over 15 years, with a simultaneously increased prescription of gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin). SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This nationwide study of 66,577 Danish patients with high-impact chronic pain reveals a significant decrease in filled opioid prescriptions over the past 15 years, with a simultaneous rise in gabapentinoid use before referral to pain centres. These findings suggest a shift in clinical practice towards alternative pain management strategies. The study underscores the need for continued research into the long-term effects of these changes and their impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsChronic PainDrug PrescriptionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDenmarkFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesYoung AdultAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID39465942
PMCPMC11755695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.