Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025
Perspectives of People With HIV on Implementing Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine in Clinics and Community Settings in the United Kingdom: Results From the Antisexist, Antiracist, Antiageist Implementing Long-acting Novel Antiretrovirals Study.
Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals - the ILANA Study
PrEP-LANA (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis- Long-acting Novel Antiviral Agent)
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Long-Acting Cabotegravir Injections Are More Acceptable Than Long-Acting Lenacapavir Injections After One Dose: Results From the CLARITY Randomized Crossover Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Trial
- Rapid Virologic Suppression With Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine Facilitates Early Switch to Long-Acting Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine for Treatment-Naive People With HIV-1: Month 11/12 Outcomes From the Phase 3b VOLITION Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Accelerating Low-Barrier Use of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy to Maximize Impact in People with HIV and Viremia or Adherence Challenges.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2026Review
- Balancing solidarity, normality and trust: reasons for (non-)participation in an injectable HIV antiretroviral therapy study in the United Kingdom.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and predictors of treatment discontinuation of long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine in virologically suppressed people with HIV: real-life data from the Icona Cohort.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- The Meandrous Route of Rilpivirine in the Search for the Miraculous Drug to Treat HIV Infections.Viruses · 2025Article
- Achieving equitable recruitment through inclusive protocol design: lessons learned from the ILANA study.Trials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe equity-focused Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness of delivering on-label 2-monthly cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB + RPV) injections for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 therapy in clinics and community settings.
methodsThe study, which mandated inclusive recruitment, was conducted May-December 2022 at 6 UK sites. Injections were delivered in clinic (month [M] 1-6) and in clinic or community setting according to patient choice (M6-12). Surveys were completed at baseline, M4, and M12 using validated measures for feasibility (FIM), acceptability (AIM), and appropriateness (IAM). Primary endpoint: proportion of participants agreeing that the injection and community setting were feasible (FIM ≥4) at M12. Fourteen participants completed interviews at baseline and M12.
resultsCommunity settings offered by sites included: home visits (n = 3), HIV support organizations (n = 2), and community clinic (n = 1). Of 114 participants, 54% were female, 70% racially minoritized, and 40% aged ≥50 years. A total of 27/114 chose to receive injections in community settings. FIM/AIM/IAM scores at M12 were high for the injection (79.0-87.4%) and lower for the community setting (44.2-47.4%) overall. Subgroup analyses indicated differences in scores by gender and ethnicity. Among those who attended the community, FIM/AIM/IAM scores for the community setting at M12 were high (73.1-80.8%). Concerns about stigma, inconvenience, and losing access to trusted clinicians negatively influenced perceptions of receiving injections at community settings, amongst other factors.
conclusionsCAB + RPV injections were considered highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate; however, few chose community delivery. Those that chose community delivery found it highly acceptable and feasible. Further exploration of CAB + RPV delivery in alternative community sites not offered (eg, primary care, pharmacies) is warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05294159.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.