Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465531›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of medicine2024

Long-term safety of mepolizumab for up to ∼10 years in patients with severe asthma: open-label extension study.

Ian Pavord, Robert Chan, Nicola Brown, Peter Howarth, Martyn Gilson, Robert G Price, Jorge Maspero

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00244686 (104317), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00244686 no longer availablenot on this map

104317: An Open-Label Compassionate Use Access and Long-Term Access Study of Anti IL-5 (Mepolizumab) Treatment in Subjects With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome. 201956: A Long-term Access Programme for Subjects With Severe Asthma Who Participated in a GSK-sponsored Mepolizumab Clinical Study. 112562: Expanded Access to Mepolizumab for Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

Typeexpanded_accessSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineConditionsHypereosinophilic SyndromeArmsMepolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rethinking asthma therapy, part 2: transdermal strategies for adjunct asthma and allergy treatments.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ian PavordRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robert ChanClinical Sciences, Respiratory, GSK, London, UK.
Nicola BrownClinical Sciences, Respiratory, GSK, London, UK.
Peter HowarthGlobal Medical, Specialty Medicine TA, GSK, London, UK.
Martyn GilsonRespiratory Research and Development, GSK, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK.
Robert G PriceBiostatistics, GSK, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK.
Jorge MasperoClinical Investigation, Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundacion CIDEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLong-term safety monitoring of mepolizumab is necessary to support real-world use for the treatment of severe asthma. This Long-Term Access Program assessed the safety and benefit:risk of mepolizumab in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with severe asthma. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a multicenter, Phase IIIb safety, open-label extension study of multiple prior studies assessing mepolizumab in addition to standard of care (Aug 2015 - Aug 2022). Adults/adolescents (≥12 years of age) received mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks until mepolizumab was commercialized. Pediatric patients (6-11 years of age) received mepolizumab 40 mg or 100 mg SC (bodyweight <40 or ≥40 kg, respectively) every 4 weeks. Safety was assessed every 4 weeks and benefit:risk every 12 weeks.

resultsOf the 514 patients enrolled, 57% were female and the mean age was 51.1 (standard deviation: 14.9) years; 24 (5%) patients were 6-17 years of age. Total cumulative mepolizumab exposure across all mepolizumab studies included in this analysis was 1500.59 patient-years; median exposure was 2.03 (range, 0.08 to 9.97) years. Overall, 37 (7%) patients experienced on-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs): 34/502 (7%) in the 100 mg SC group and 3/7 (43%) in the 40 mg SC pediatric group. Two patients experienced SAEs considered to be treatment-related by the investigator. Infections were the most common SAEs of special interest (9 [2%] patients). Physician-assessed benefit:risk of mepolizumab supported continued treatment over the study period.

conclusionsThis long-term safety analysis of mepolizumab was consistent with previous reports, with no emerging safety concerns; most patients had a favorable benefit:risk up to ∼10 years. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT00244686 (GSK ID 201956).

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedmepolizumabLong-term access programmepolizumabopen-label extensionsafetysevere asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype

Identifiers

PMID39465531
PMCPMC11520089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.