ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The lncRNA-m6A axis in cancer: a bidirectional regulatory network in tumor progression and therapeutic resistance.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a fatal malignancy with rising incidence and low cure rates. This study aims to investigate the effect of alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5)-mediated N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification on adriamycin (ADR) resistance in AML. First, the levels of ALKBH5, taurine upregulated 1 (TUG1), YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein F2 (YTHDF2), euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 2 (EHMT2), and SH3 domain-binding glutamate-rich protein-like (SH3BGRL) were measured. IC50 values, cell proliferation, and apoptosis were determined. m6A levels were analyzed, and the binding interactions between TUG1 and YTHDF2, as well as TUG1 and EHMT2, were assessed. The stability of TUG1 and the enrichment of EHMT2 and H3K9me2 on the SH3BGRL promoter were confirmed. In vivo experiments were conducted to further validate the results. The findings revealed that ALKBH5 was overexpressed in both AML- and ADR-resistant cells, and silencing ALKBH5 reduced the ADR resistance of AML cells. ALKBH5 removed m6A modifications from TUG1, disrupting the interaction between YTHDF2 and TUG1, thereby stabilizing TUG1 expression. TUG1 bound to EHMT2, promoting H3K9me2 modification on the SH3BGRL promoter and suppressing SH3BGRL expression. Overexpression of TUG1 or knockdown of SH3BGRL reversed the suppressive effect of ALKBH5 knockdown on ADR resistance. In vivo, ALKBH5 knockdown inhibited ADR resistance in AML cells. In conclusion, ALKBH5 removed m6A modification to stabilize TUG1 expression in a YTHDF2-dependent manner, enhancing H3K9me2 levels on the SH3BGRL promoter and suppressing SH3BGRL expression, thus promoting ADR resistance in AML cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.