Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465442›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Effectiveness of specialist involvement in case discussion conferences with primary healthcare providers on the management of type 2 diabetes patients: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Jia Li, Jiawei Li, Chao Long, Aoqi Ge, Luping Hei, Zhikai Yang, Juanjuan Li, Xianjing Qin, Xinlu Song, Beibei Yuan

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jia LiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jiawei LiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chao LongDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Aoqi GeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Luping HeiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhikai YangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Juanjuan LiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xianjing QinHealth Policy Research Center, School of Information and Management, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Xinlu SongHealth Commission of Shouguang City, Weifang City, Shandong Province, China.
Beibei YuanChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China. beibeiyuan@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn supporting primary healthcare in delivering high-quality care for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), previous research emphasized strategies to facilitate communication and collaboration between primary healthcare providers and hospitals. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of case discussion conferences between specialists from hospitals and primary healthcare providers in China on the optimization of diabetes management and the improvement of patient health outcomes.

methodsThis study will be a parallel cluster randomized controlled trial in which primary healthcare institutions in Shouguang city and Shangsi County will be randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The intervention will involve regular case discussion conferences where attendants will meet to discuss complex cases with patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, exchange experiences, and seek and provide expert advice. Family doctor teams from primary healthcare institutions and specialists from secondary or tertiary hospitals will engage in these conferences. Data will be collected at baseline and at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The primary clinical outcome measures will focus on the changes in the HbA1c and FBG levels of patients under management. The secondary outcomes will include other physiological indicators, such as blood pressure, BMI, and cholesterol. The evaluation will extend to changes in the capabilities and behaviors of primary healthcare providers. Furthermore, the feasibility and adherence of this intervention will be thoroughly assessed. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to generate robust evidence on the effectiveness of case discussion conferences, an interprofessional collaboration strategy, in enhancing diabetes care delivery in primary healthcare, with the ultimate goal of improving patient health outcomes.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300078829. Registered on December 19, 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=210293.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood GlucoseChinaGlycated HemoglobinHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Care TeamSpecializationTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanCase discussion conferencesCluster randomized controlled trialPrimary healthcareSpecialist involvementType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39465442
PMCPMC11514827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.