Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465437›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Whole-exome profiles of inflammatory breast cancer and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

François Bertucci, Arnaud Guille, Florence Lerebours, Michele Ceccarelli, Najeeb Syed, José Adélaïde, Pascal Finetti, Naoto T Ueno, Steven Van Laere, Patrice Viens and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

François BertucciPredictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. bertuccif@ipc.unicancer.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0157-0959
Arnaud Guille *Predictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
Florence Lerebours *Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie Saint-Cloud, Paris, France.
Michele Ceccarelli *Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Najeeb Syed *University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
José AdélaïdePredictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
Pascal FinettiPredictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
Naoto T UenoUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Steven Van LaereCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Patrice ViensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Alexandre De NonnevilleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Anthony GoncalvesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Daniel BirnbaumPredictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
Céline Callens *Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie Saint-Cloud, Paris, France.
Davide Bedognetti *Tumor Biology and Immunology Laboratory, Research Branch, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Emilie Mamessier *Predictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.

Funding

Association Ruban Rose Prix Ruban Rose 2020Ligue Contre le Cancer EL2022/FB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) became a standard treatment strategy for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) because of high disease aggressiveness. However, given the heterogeneity of IBC, no molecular feature reliably predicts the response to chemotherapy. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) of clinical tumor samples provides an opportunity to identify genomic alterations associated with chemosensitivity.

methodsWe retrospectively applied WES to 44 untreated IBC primary tumor samples and matched normal DNA. The pathological response to NACT, assessed on operative specimen, distinguished the patients with versus without pathological complete response (pCR versus no-pCR respectively). We compared the mutational profiles, spectra and signatures, pathway mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs), HRD, and heterogeneity scores between pCR versus no-pCR patients.

resultsThe TMB, HRD, and mutational spectra were not different between the complete (N = 13) versus non-complete (N = 31) responders. The two most frequently mutated genes were TP53 and PIK3CA. They were more frequently mutated in the complete responders, but the difference was not significant. Only two genes, NLRP3 and SLC9B1, were significantly more frequently mutated in the complete responders (23% vs. 0%). By contrast, several biological pathways involved in protein translation, PI3K pathway, and signal transduction showed significantly higher mutation frequency in the patients with pCR. We observed a higher abundance of COSMIC signature 7 (due to ultraviolet light exposure) in tumors from complete responders. The comparison of CNAs of the 3808 genes included in the GISTIC regions between both patients' groups identified 234 genes as differentially altered. The CIN signatures were not differentially represented between the complete versus non-complete responders. Based on the H-index, the patients with heterogeneous tumors displayed a lower pCR rate (11%) than those with less heterogeneous tumors (35%).

conclusionsThis is the first study aiming at identifying correlations between the WES data of IBC samples and the achievement of pCR to NACT. Our results, obtained in this 44-sample series, suggest a few subtle genomic alterations associated with pathological response. Additional investigations are required in larger series.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsMutationNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCopy number alterationInflammatory breast cancerMutationWhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39465437
PMCPMC11514970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.