Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465419›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Clinical impact of the implementation of monocyte distribution width (MDW) measurement on time to anti-infective administration in sepsis patients in the emergency department: a before/after cohort study.

Marta Cancella de Abreu, Timothé Sala, Enfel Houas, Ilaria Cherubini, Martin Larsen, Pierre Hausfater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta Cancella de AbreuEmergency Department, GHU APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. martabfca@gmail.com.
Timothé SalaEmergency Department, GHU APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Enfel HouasEmergency Department, GHU APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Ilaria CherubiniEmergency Department, GHU APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Martin LarsenInserm UMR-S1135, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI Paris), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Pierre HausfaterEmergency Department, GHU APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely recognition of sepsis in emergency department (ED) is challenging. We evaluated the impact of implementing the biomarker monocyte distribution width (MDW) at bedside, on the time to anti-infective administration.

methodsWe conducted a before-and-after cohort study in the ED of an academic hospital in Paris, to compare sepsis patients care and outcomes, before and after the implementation of point of care (POC) MDW measurement in the ED. During post-implementation period (period-2), MDW was measured with complete blood count by ED nurses with results given in 2 min: if above 21.5 units, ED physicians were asked to consider sepsis and to start an anti-infectious as soon as possible. Primary endpoint was time to anti-infectious administration (TTA) from ED arrival, and secondary endpoints were TTA from sepsis onset (TTAS), length of stay, mortality, and hospitalization rates.

resultsIn total, 255 patients (period-1) and 180 patients (period-2) with sepsis were included. The TTA was 5.4 h (3.5-7.7) period-1 and 4.9 h (IQR 2.5-7.1) in period-2 (p = 0.06). MDW implementation significantly reduced the median TTAS from to 3.7 h (IQR 1.5-5.8) in period-1, to 2.2 h (IQR 0.5-4.5) in period-2 (p < 0.001). Mortality rates remained similar between the two periods (18% vs. 16% respectively, p = 0.4), as did hospitalization rates (93% vs. 91%, p = 0.4) and ED length of stay (7.2 h (5.3-9.8) vs 7.0 (5.4-9.4), p = 0.7).

conclusionImplementing POC MDW measurement in the ED protocols enhances the timeliness of anti-infective administration from sepsis onset, meeting current sepsis management guidelines.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsEmergency Service, HospitalMonocytesSepsisAgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParisTime FactorsAnti-Infective AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39465419
PMCPMC11514793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.