ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Assessment of diagnostic performance and complication rate in percutaneous lung biopsy based on target nodule size.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePercutaneous lung biopsies are a common radiologic procedure, although they are not without risk. As imaging techniques continue to increase in sophistication, referring providers may request lung biopsies on smaller and smaller targets. Our purpose is to better understand when we should expect lung biopsies to yield diagnostic results of lung nodules of varying sizes and how size impacts the complication rate of the procedure.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all outpatient lung biopsies performed at our institution between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020. For all procedures, target nodule size, location, diagnostic performance, and complication rates were recorded.
resultsWe found that diagnostic yield increased with increasing nodule size, with ROC analysis indicating that the best threshold size to predict a diagnostic sample is 1.4 cm. Pneumothorax rate significantly increased with decreasing target size, but there was no significant association between target size and the need for either chest tube placement or hospital admission.
conclusionThe smaller a lung nodule is, the harder it is to obtain a diagnostic sample, and the more likely it is to develop a post-biopsy pneumothorax. However, smaller target size is not associated with an increased risk of chest tube placement or hospital admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39465415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.