ArticleBMC cancer2024
A 16-year evaluation of opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in China: comparative findings between non-smokers and smokers.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Innovative technologies and their clinical prospects for early lung cancer screening.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- LDCT screening for lung cancer in East Asian never-smokers: balancing benefits and overdiagnosis-related harms.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors of lung nodules in a non-smoking Chinese population: a prospective study of low-dose computed tomography screening.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for non-smokers with a first-degree relative history of lung cancer.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Lung cancer screening in people who have never smoked: lessons from East Asia.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- CCT3 Facilitates the Malignant Progression of NSCLC and SCLC via PI3 K/AKT-EMT Axis and Emerges as a Novel Serum Diagnostic Biomarker.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening effectively reduces LC mortality in high-risk individuals with a history of smoking in China, the feasibility and efficacy of lung cancer screening (LCS) in individuals who never smoked versus individuals who smoked remains unclear.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospective cohort studies at the National Cancer Center (NCC) in China from January 2006 to December 2022. A comprehensive LCS initiative was undertaken, involving 30,468 participants (54.5% male). Participants underwent LCS using LDCT. Potential malignancies were managed through joint consensus between patients and their physicians. Epidemiology, screening eligibility criteria, and LC detection rates and survival outcomes were compared between individuals who smoked and individuals who never smoked.
resultsAmong 30,468 participants, 339 LCs were pathologically confirmed in 289 patients. The LC detection rate was 0.9% (289/30,468) overall, 0.8% in individuals who smoked (71/9,042), and 1.0% in individuals who never smoked (218/21,426). In individuals who smoked, LC detection rates were 0.5% (21/4516) and 1.1% (50/4526) in the < 20 and ≥ 20 pack-year subgroups, respectively (P = 0.001). Early-stage LC (stage 0 or I) was detected in 73.8% of the individuals who smoked and in 78.8% of individuals who never smoked, while advanced LC (stage III-IV) was found 8.8% of individuals who smoked and 4.2% of individuals who never smoked, respectively. Significant differences in histologic types were found between individuals who smoked and individuals who never smoked (P = 0.01), although adenocarcinoma was the most prevalent in both groups, at 83.0% and 78.8%, respectively. The median nodule size was 9.9 mm (IQR, 8.0-13.8) in individuals who smoked and 9.2 mm (IQR, 6.8-13.6) in individuals who never smoked (P = 0.228). Individuals who never smoked tended to favour surgical treatment alone (88.0%) more than individuals who smoked (81.3%). The 10-year survival rate was higher in individuals who never smoked (92.6%) than in individuals who smoked (88.8%). Only 15.6% (45/289) of patients with LC met the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for LDCT eligibility, while 29.0% (84/289) met the China guideline for the screening and early detection of lung cancer (CGSL) criteria. Median follow-up for those followed was 25.4 (IQR, 13.7-43.3) months.
conclusionsLDCT screening improves early LC detection and treatment outcomes for both individuals who smoked and individuals who never smoked. Significant differences exist in epidemiology, histologic type, and survival between these groups. The USPSTF and CGSL criteria miss a significant number of LC cases, particularly among individuals who never smoked. Integrating individuals who never smoked into LCS programs is essential, yet it comes with its own challenges, such as managing radiation risks, allocating resources effectively, and considering financial aspects. Consequently, there is an urgent need for LCS programs in China to better identify the "high-risk" non-smoker population susceptible to LC and to ensure that potential risks associated with screening are reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.