ArticleBMC health services research2024
Revised Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC 2.0): cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Malay version.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Version 2 (HSOPSv2) in Spanish Hospitals.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Assessment of the patient safety culture and the influencing factors among medical staff in a non-public tertiary general hospital in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Patient safety culture and climate in Estonian hospitals: a cross-sectional study on employees and background characteristics.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Patient Safety Activities of Clinical Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Data Analysis.International nursing review · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Translation and validation of the Dari version of the hospital survey on patient safety culture for healthcare settings in Afghanistan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Portuguese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the hospital survey on patient safety culture 2.0.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Patient safety culture in resource-limited healthcare settings: A multicentre survey.PloS one · 2025Article
- Patient safety culture assessment in five public hospitals of Sichuan Province: a cross-sectional study with HSOPSC 2.0.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (HSOPSC) developed by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has been adopted worldwide. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) version 2.0 was released in 2019, but there have been no publications to date of its translation and validation for use in Malaysia. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the revised HSOPSC 2.0 into the Malay language and determine its psychometric properties including the content, face, and construct validity, and reliability analyses.
methodsThis study was conducted from April - June 2023 and divided into three stages: translation and cultural adaptation; content and face validation; and construct validation using confirmatory factor analysis and reliability testing among 319 healthcare personnel from a public university hospital in Malaysia.
resultsThe translated instrument demonstrated excellent content validity (I-CVI = 0.80 ~ 1.0, SCVI-average = 0.96) and face validity (I-FVI = 0.80 ~ 1.0, SFVI-average = 0.98). Reliability testing was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.60 ~ 0.80) but indicated that reverse-coded items were poorly perceived. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory model fit for the translated instrument (RMSEA = 0.08, GFI = 0.80, CFI = 0.80, and χ2/df = 2.96). Six items had very low factor loadings (< 0.40), with two constructs "Staffing and Work Pace" and "Response to Error" having AVE < 0.4, but acceptable CR ≥ 0.6. No items were removed from the questionnaire despite low factor loadings following a consensus from an expert panel.
conclusionThe Malay version of the HSOPSC 2.0 containing ten domains and 32 items demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties following expert consensus, with acceptable reliability and construct validity for measuring patient safety culture. Given factor loadings smaller than 0.40 in six items, broader validation is suggested to support the use of the translated instrument in the Malaysian healthcare setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.