Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465395›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2024

Self-supervised learning framework application for medical image analysis: a review and summary.

Xiangrui Zeng, Nibras Abdullah, Putra Sumari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangrui ZengSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. xavierzeng@student.usm.my.
Nibras AbdullahFaculty of Computer Studies, Arab Open University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. n.faqera@arabou.edu.sa.
Putra SumariSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual annotation of medical image datasets is labor-intensive and prone to biases. Moreover, the rate at which image data accumulates significantly outpaces the speed of manual annotation, posing a challenge to the advancement of machine learning, particularly in the realm of supervised learning. Self-supervised learning is an emerging field that capitalizes on unlabeled data for training, thereby circumventing the need for extensive manual labeling. This learning paradigm generates synthetic pseudo-labels through pretext tasks, compelling the network to acquire image representations in a pseudo-supervised manner and subsequently fine-tuning with a limited set of annotated data to achieve enhanced performance. This review begins with an overview of prevalent types and advancements in self-supervised learning, followed by an exhaustive and systematic examination of methodologies within the medical imaging domain from 2018 to September 2024. The review encompasses a range of medical image modalities, including CT, MRI, X-ray, Histology, and Ultrasound. It addresses specific tasks, such as Classification, Localization, Segmentation, Reduction of False Positives, Improvement of Model Performance, and Enhancement of Image Quality. The analysis reveals a descending order in the volume of related studies, with CT and MRI leading the list, followed by X-ray, Histology, and Ultrasound. Except for CT and MRI, there is a greater prevalence of studies focusing on contrastive learning methods over generative learning approaches. The performance of MRI/Ultrasound classification and all image types segmentation still has room for further exploration. Generally, this review can provide conceptual guidance for medical professionals to combine self-supervised learning with their research.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningHumansCNNComputer visionMedical imageSelf-supervisedTransformer

Identifiers

PMID39465395
PMCPMC11514943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.