ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Five states of reduction in OTA/AO A1.3 intertrochanteric fractures of the femur a biomechanical study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to analyze the differences in mechanical stability of OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fractures under various reduction conditions.
methodsTwenty standard synbone artificial femur test bones were selected for the OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fracture model. The models were divided into five groups according to their reduction state: positive support, neutral support, negative support, varus fixation, and valgus fixation, with four specimens in each group. All models were fixed using PFNA intramedullary fixation and subjected to static axial compression tests. The subsidence displacement of the proximal femur under different loads and the axial stiffness of the model were measured to verify the mechanical stability of the OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fracture under different reduction conditions.
resultsAfter the static axial compression test, the proximal femoral subsidence displacement in the positive support and neutral support groups was lower than that in the negative support, valgus fixation, and varus fixation groups (p < 0.001). The axial stiffness of the model was highest in the positive support group. Significant differences in subsidence displacement and axial stiffness were found between the groups (p < 0.001). The positive support group demonstrated the best mechanical stability, while the varus fixation group showed the poorest performance.
conclusionPositive support of the medial cortex can be regarded as the best reduction state for OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fractures, suggesting that this approach should be preferred during surgery to enhance mechanical stability and improve clinical outcomes. Conversely, varus fixation should be avoided due to its inferior stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.