ArticleScientific reports2024
Synergistic pairing of synthetic image generation with disease classification modeling permits rapid digital classification tool development.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine-learning disease classification models have the potential to support diagnosis of various diseases. Pairing classification models with synthetic image generation may overcome barriers to developing classification models and permit their use in numerous contexts. Using 10 images of penises with human papilloma virus (HPV)-related disease, we trained a denoising diffusion probabilistic model. Combined with text-to-image generation, we produced 630 synthetic images, of which 500 were deemed plausible by expert clinicians. We used those images to train a Vision Transformer model. We assessed the model's performance on clinical images of HPV-related disease (n = 70), diseases other than HPV (n = 70), and non-diseased images (n = 70), calculating recall, precision, F1-score, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC). The model correctly classified 64 of 70 images of HPV-related disease, with a recall of 91.4% (95% CI 82.3%-96.8%). The precision of the model for HPV-related disease was 95.5% (95% CI 87.5%-99.1%), and the F1-score was 93.4%. The AUC for HPV-related disease was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.0). Overall, the HPV-related disease classification model demonstrated excellent performance on clinical images, which was trained exclusively using synthetic images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.