Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465320›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2024

Beyond traditional magnetic resonance processing with artificial intelligence.

Amir Jahangiri, Vladislav Orekhov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applications of quantitativeJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amir JahangiriDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Swedish NMR Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-3738
Vladislav OrekhovDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Swedish NMR Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden. vladislav.orekhov@nmr.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-6896

Funding

TRD3 NMRbox: Bayesian AnalyticsP41GM111135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2015 to 2024
$14.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM111135Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2019-03561Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2023-03485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart signal processing approaches using Artificial Intelligence are gaining momentum in NMR applications. In this study, we demonstrate that AI offers new opportunities beyond tasks addressed by traditional techniques. We developed and trained artificial neural networks to solve three problems that until now were deemed "impossible": quadrature detection using only Echo (or Anti-Echo) modulation from the traditional Echo/Anti-Echo scheme; accessing uncertainty of signal intensity at each point in a spectrum processed by any given method; and defining a reference-free score for quantitative access of NMR spectrum quality. Our findings highlight the potential of AI techniques to revolutionize NMR processing and analysis.

Identifiers

PMID39465320
PMCPMC11514297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.