ArticleScientific reports2024
Bone scintigraphy based on deep learning model and modified growth optimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-time reconstruction of 3D bone models via very-low-dose protocols.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone scintigraphy is recognized as an efficient diagnostic method for whole-body screening for bone metastases. At the moment, whole-body bone scan image analysis is primarily dependent on manual reading by nuclear medicine doctors. However, manual analysis needs substantial experience and is both stressful and time-consuming. To address the aforementioned issues, this work proposed a machine-learning technique that uses phases to detect Bone scintigraphy. The first phase in the proposed model is the feature extraction and it was conducted based on integrating the Mobile Vision Transformer (MobileViT) model in our framework to capture highly complex representations from raw medical imagery using two primary components including ViT and lightweight CNN featuring a limited number of parameters. In addition, the second phase is named feature selection, and it is dependent on the Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (AOA) being used to improve the Growth Optimizer (GO). We evaluate the performance of the proposed FS model, named GOAOA using a set of 18 UCI datasets. Additionally, the applicability of Bone scintigraphy for real-world application is evaluated using 2800 bone scan images (1400 normal and 1400 abnormal). The results and statistical analysis revealed that the proposed GOAOA algorithm as an FS technique outperforms the other FS algorithms employed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.