ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024
Serratus Anterior Plane Block Remote Learning Curriculum.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Regional anesthesia aids in management of acute pain in the emergency department, but many emergency physicians remain inadequately trained. Further complicating medical education, our academic center continues to use remote learning as the primary setting for residency didactics. This project aims to create a remote conference session on ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane blocks (USG-SAPB). Methods: We used the ADDIE (analyze, design, develop, implement, evaluate) model for curricular design, with emergency medicine residents as our intended learners. For the analyze element, we examined clinical need and resident program evaluation feedback. For design, we utilized best practices for remote learning, principles of mental rehearsal, and multimodal instructional theory. For develop, we completed recruitment of faculty leads, materials, and beta testing of each component. We implemented our 50-minute session on the videoconferencing platform Zoom. For evaluate, we created a program evaluation survey based on Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. Results: Seventeen learners completed the evaluation. For Kirkpatrick level 1, 94% reported being very or extremely satisfied. For Kirkpatrick level 2, 91% ranked their presession confidence level in performing USG-SAPB as not at all or slightly confident, compared to the postsession, where 88% ranked themselves as moderately, very, or extremely confident. For Kirkpatrick level 3, 94% reported that they would incorporate at least a moderate amount of content into clinical practice. Discussion: This remote learning session on USG-SAPB demonstrated high levels of learner satisfaction, improvement in learner confidence, and potential to impact learners' clinical practice. Future studies can elucidate patient outcomes related to educational sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.