ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024
A systematic review of deep learning-based denoising for low-dose computed tomography from a perceptual quality perspective.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative evaluation of a deep learning-based noise reduction algorithm in digital radiography using noise power spectrum analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- No Reproducibility, No Progress: Rethinking CT Benchmarking.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Automated pulmonary nodule classification from low-dose CT images using ERBNet: an ensemble learning approach.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Low-dose computed tomography image denoising using pixel level non-local self-similarity prior with non-local means for healthcare informatics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans are essential in reducing radiation exposure but often suffer from significant image noise that can impair diagnostic accuracy. While deep learning approaches have enhanced LDCT denoising capabilities, the predominant reliance on objective metrics like PSNR and SSIM has resulted in over-smoothed images that lack critical detail. This paper explores advanced deep learning methods tailored specifically to improve perceptual quality in LDCT images, focusing on generating diagnostic-quality images preferred in clinical practice. We review and compare current methodologies, including perceptual loss functions and generative adversarial networks, addressing the significant limitations of current benchmarks and the subjective nature of perceptual quality evaluation. Through a systematic analysis, this study underscores the urgent need for developing methods that balance both perceptual and diagnostic quality, proposing new directions for future research in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.