ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024
Strategies for mitigating inter-crystal scattering effects in positron emission tomography: a comprehensive review.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-crystal scatter recovery of a light-sharing depth-encoding Prism-PET prototype scanner using a diffusion model.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Potential and challenges of Positron Emission Tomography beyond conventional preclinical and clinical imaging.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Investigating the timing behavior of compton scattering in BGO for time-of-flight PET.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Image-space compensation of inter-crystal scattering in PET using a neural network based filter.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Development of Whole-Body TOF-DOI PET Detector Using Dual-Ended Readout Method.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter-crystal scattering (ICS) events in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) present challenges affecting system sensitivity and image quality. Understanding the physics and factors influencing ICS occurrence is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate its impact. This review paper explores the physics behind ICS events and their occurrence within PET detectors. Various methodologies, including energy-based comparisons, Compton kinematics-based approaches, statistical methods, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, which have been proposed for identifying and recovering ICS events accurately are introduced. Energy-based methods offer simplicity by comparing energy depositions in crystals. Compton kinematics-based approaches utilize trajectory information for first interaction position estimation, yielding reasonably good results. Additionally, statistical approach and AI algorithms contribute by optimizing likelihood analysis and neural network models for improved positioning accuracy. Experimental validations and simulation studies highlight the potential of recovering ICS events and enhancing PET sensitivity and image quality. Especially, AI technologies offers a promising avenue for addressing ICS challenges and improving PET image accuracy and resolution. These methods offer promising solutions for overcoming the challenges posed by ICS events and enhancing the accuracy and resolution of PET imaging, ultimately improving diagnostic capabilities and patient outcomes. Further studies applying these approaches to real PET systems are needed to validate theoretical results and assess practical implementation feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.