Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39465098›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2024

How social workers are positioned and constructed as contributors within national palliative care policies in Sweden: a policy analysis.

Axel Ågren, Bodil Holmberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Axel ÅgrenDivision of Social Work, Department of Culture and Society (IKOS), Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, Linköping SE-601 74, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-646X
Bodil HolmbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Palliative care is expected to acknowledge physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual, and social needs, to which social workers can contribute with expertise on recognizing the importance of social relations and how social inequalities impact on individuals. The social work profession faces challenges in claiming their contributions in the hierarchies of medical professions. Polices play an important role in constructing and positioning responsibilities of professions. Objectives: To analyze how social workers are positioned as contributors to palliative care within national-level policies in Sweden. Methods and materials: A policy analysis was conducted through a constructivist lens. Data were collected from 10 Swedish national-level policy documents on palliative care. Results: Three themes emerged: "A natural presence conveying special expertise"; "Emotional conversational support before and after death"; and "Practical support." Overall, social workers' contribution was vaguely described and in similar ways as registered nurses. Conclusion: In Swedish policies analyzed, social workers' contributions were difficult to differentiate from that of registered nurses, which may complicate their mutual collaborations and cause confusion for individuals at the end of life and their next of kin. Future research on how different professions are positioned within palliative care is needed to reduce risks of role blurring between professions with similar aims. Moreover, given social workers long history of psychosocial knowledge, meanings of this concept need to be further acknowledged.

Indexed as

palliative carepolicy analysisprofessionalizationrole blurringsocial work

Identifiers

PMID39465098
PMCPMC11503901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.