ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2024
Understanding the context of positive experiences of primary care for transgender and gender diverse adults: An email interview study in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in International journal of transgender health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aligning values and behaviours in LGBTQIA+ affirming care: primary care providers' perspectives.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- "It's just a general lack of awareness, that breeds a sense that there isn't space to talk about our needs": Barriers and facilitators experienced by transgender people accessing healthcare in Aotearoa/New Zealand.International journal of transgender health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Past research has demonstrated that transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people often have negative experiences of healthcare. Exploratory research is needed to provide in-depth understanding of the healthcare experiences of TGD people. Primary care is a crucial element of healthcare, but past research has tended to overlook what contributes specifically to positive experiences of primary care for TGD adults. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore positive experiences of TGD adults when engaging with primary care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods: Semi-structured email interviews were conducted with 11 TGD adults aged 20- to 62-years-old, with a range of binary or non-binary genders living across Aotearoa New Zealand. The email interview method allowed nationwide recruitment and flexible interaction. All aspects of the study were led by a researcher who is part of the TGD community. Results: Three themes were formulated to explain TGD participants' positive experiences with primary care. In order to contextualize positive experiences, participants described past negative experiences of healthcare and low expectations (Theme 1: The Sad State of Care). Participants also described exerting autonomy, for example by carefully selecting a general practitioner (GP) or choosing when to disclose transgender status to their GP (Theme 2: The Sphere of Control). Three levels were evident in positive experiences (Theme 3: The Gradient of Positive Experiences): basic professionalism, more desirable experiences of trans-specific competencies, and GPs as advocates for systemic change. Discussion: TGD people experience positive interactions in primary care in a variety of ways, all of which are contextualized by the negative state of healthcare at present. TGD people create opportunity for autonomy while navigating healthcare, which requires a form of interacting that can be termed reactive self-determination. Training for health professionals could apply the gradient of positive experiences to scaffold appropriate primary care for TGD adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.