ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Near Infrared Spectroscopy as a Diagnostic Tool for Screening of Intracranial Hematomas; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Stereotactic Hematoma Evacuation for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and the Value of Multimodal Monitoring.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A handheld near infrared scanner for the detection of acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A scoping review on the essential role of global neurotrauma in achieving the sustainable development goals.Discover public health · 2026Review
- Rapid prediction of cerebral edema on CT scan after traumatic brain injury.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Machine learning enhanced noninvasive transcranial stroke detection using a portable eddy current damping sensor.iScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence supports the clinical applicability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in intracranial hematoma detection in prehospital settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of NIRS for detecting intracranial hematoma in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: A systematic search was performed in July 2024 in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of NIRS in detecting intracranial hematoma in both adult and pediatric patients suspected of TBI in prehospital or emergency settings, using brain computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard. Results: Eighteen studies enrolling 2979 patients were included. NIRS exhibited an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88, 0.93), with a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.91), and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.89) across all age groups. In children, the results demonstrated an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.94), sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.21, 1.00), and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.91). Among adults, the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93), with sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.92) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.91), respectively. Performance improved when NIRS was operated by non-physicians (AUC = 0.94 [95% CI: 0.91, 0.96], sensitivity = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.95], specificity = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.93]) compared to physicians (AUC = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.92], sensitivity = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.94], specificity = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.76]). Patients' age group and operator type were identified as potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, particularly in mild TBI cases and studies implementing a ΔOD > 0.2 as the threshold for a positive NIRS result. Conclusion: NIRS proves to be an effective diagnostic tool for detecting traumatic intracranial hematoma in both pediatric and adult groups, with high sensitivity and specificity. Its utility in prehospital triage, operated by physicians or paramedics, underscores its potential for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.