ArticleExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2024
Diagnostic utility of prostate health index density prior to MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy.
Article in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aim: Prostate biopsy can be prone to complications and thus should be avoided when unnecessary. Although the combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the prostate health index (PHI), and PHI density (PHID) has been shown to improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), there is limited information available assessing its clinical utility. We sought to determine whether using PHID could enhance the detection of PCa on MRI ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy (MRF-TB) compared to other biomarker cutoffs. Methods: Between June 2015 and December 2020, 302 men obtained PHI testing before MRF-TB at a single institution. We used descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the predictive accuracy of PHID and PHI to detect ≥ Gleason grade group (GGG) 2 PCa and identify cutoff values. Results: Any cancer grade was identified in 75.5% of patients and ≥ GGG2 PCa was identified in 45% of patients. The median PHID was 1.05 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.59-1.64]. A PHID cutoff of 0.91 had a higher discriminatory ability to predict ≥ GGG2 PCa compared to PHI > 27, PHI > 36, and prostate specific-antigen (PSA) density > 0.15 (AUC: 0.707 vs. 0.549 vs. 0.620 vs. 0.601), particularly in men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 1-2 lesions on MRI (AUC: 0.817 vs. 0.563 vs. 0.621 vs. 0.678). At this cutoff, 35.0% of all the original biopsies could be safely avoided (PHID < 0.91 and no ≥ GGG2 PCa) and csPCa would be missed in 9.67% of patients who would have been biopsied. In patients with PI-RADS 1-2 lesions using a PHID cutoff of 0.91, 56.8% of biopsies could be safely avoided while missing 0 csPCa. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a PHID cutoff of 0.91 improves the selection of patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen who are referred for prostate biopsy, and potentially in patients with PI-RADS 1-2 lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.