ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2024
A fast solution to the lasso problem with equality constraints.
Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The equality-constrained lasso problem augments the standard lasso by imposing additional structure on regression coefficients. Despite the broad utilities of the equality-constrained lasso, existing algorithms are typically computationally inefficient and only applicable to linear and logistic models. In this paper, we devise a fast solution to the equality-constrained lasso problem with a two-stage algorithm: first obtaining candidate covariate subsets of increasing size from unconstrained lasso problems and then leveraging an efficient combined alternating direction method of multipliers/Newton-Raphson algorithm. Our proposed algorithm leads to substantial speedups in getting the solution path of the constrained lasso and can be easily adapted to generalized linear models and Cox proportional hazards models. We conduct extensive simulation studies to demonstrate the computational advantage of the proposed method over existing solvers. To further show the unique utility of our method, we consider two real-world data examples: a microbiome regression analysis and a myeloma survival analysis; neither example could be solved by naively fitting the constrained lasso problem on the full predictor set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.