ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and sociocultural factors influencing cervical cancer screening and vaccination among women in rural communities of Gujarat: A mixed-methods study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality among women in India. Screening can help in early detection and improve outcomes. However, uptake remains low, especially in rural areas. Understanding multidimensional factors influencing screening in local contexts is essential to promote equitable access. This study examined knowledge, attitudes, practices, and sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening and vaccination in rural India. Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted among 400 women aged 18-60 years in rural Maharashtra. Quantitative data were collected on knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices by using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 30 participants on perspectives influencing screening. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Thematic analysis was done for qualitative data. The integration provided complementary insights. Results: Quantitative results showed poor knowledge (17% had good knowledge) and positive attitudes (64%) but low screening uptake (9%). Qualitative findings revealed limited awareness, stigma around gynecological exams, gender inequities, fear, fatalism, and low prioritization of self-care as screening barriers. Conclusion: Multifaceted strategies addressing knowledge gaps, gender roles, stigma, and access are required to improve cervical cancer screening in marginalized rural communities. Mixed methods provide comprehensive evidence for designing context-specific interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.