ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
The challenge of identifying family carers in general practice at an early stage and measuring their burden: A scoping review of possible tools and their actual use.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informal care, provided unpaid by family members or friends is a crucial source for providing care at home due to chronic illnesses, disability, or long-lasting health issues. An increasing burden on informal carers largely determines the already proven negative mental and physical health effects. General practitioners are usually responsible for recognizing the effects of persistent burdens on informal carers at an early stage to maintain a functional caring relationship by providing individual support. A scoping review was conducted in four databases (PubMed, LIVIVO, Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL]) until July 31, 2023, to identify studies describing the actual use of tools to identify informal care and measure the burden due to informal care. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed to select studies. A total of 5.686 references were identified, and 59 potentially eligible articles were assessed for inclusion, resulting in the inclusion of five studies published between 2009 and 2019. Instruments were primarily used to measure burden after an intervention; only one study focused on instruments to identify carers in general practice. This review highlights the need for a tool to identify informal carers in general practice, but it is important to consider practice-specific processes and settings. Future research should take a proactive approach to testing, modifying, and implementing an assessment and optimizing framework conditions. A follow-up project should be initiated to evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted identification tool on the burden and health of family carers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.