ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Real-world performance of susceptibility testing for cefiderocol: insights from a prospective multicentre study on Gram-negative bacteria.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of medium composition on cefiderocol susceptibility testing: comparison of CLSI/EUCAST-compliant and commercial broth microdilution methods.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Japanese Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates and the Effect of IMP-Type Carbapenemases on Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Update on the comparativeJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Beyond β-Lactams: Defining the Role of Eravacycline in Multidrug-Resistant and Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cefiderocol activity against multidrug-resistant isolates from the PERSEUS study: relationship between cefiderocol minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Newer antibiotics for drug-resistant Gram-negative infections in immunocompromised hosts: from pivotal trials to high-risk practice.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Genetic characterization of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Siderophore cephalosporins.EcoSal Plus · 2025Review
- The Achilles' heel of the Trojan Horse? A systematic evaluation of cefiderocol susceptibility testing.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance of disc diffusion and gradient strip test on different Mueller-Hinton agar media plates and ComASP® and Bruker UMIC® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panels for cefiderocol susceptibility testing in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Targeted 'knock out' therapy with a combination antimicrobial regimen restores treatment options in the management of extensively drug-resistant carbapenemase-producing organisms.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP Methods: The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 Results: A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP Conclusions: DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.