ReviewJournal of environmental health science & engineering2024
The effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial community in anaerobic digestion process: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review of methods for valorisation and production of bioproducts from various cassava wastes.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Selective survival of anaerobic digester microbes afterWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026Article
- Review of full-scale advanced anaerobic digestion in North America.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025Review
- Changes in Microbial Communities in Industrial Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure Caused byBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Identifying Antimicrobial Agents fromBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Anaerobic gut fungi as biocatalysts: metabolic and physiological analysis of anaerobic gut fungi under diverse cultivation conditions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here we comprehensively review the available knowledge on effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial population and microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion (AD) fed with different substrates and different operational parameters. To identify peer-reviewed studies published in English-language journals, a comprehensive search was performed across multiple electronic databases. The eligible studies were analyzed to extract data and information pertaining to the configuration of anaerobic reactors, operational parameters, and various pretreatment processes such as chemical, biological, enzymatic, thermal, microaerobic, and ultrasonic. The findings derived from this current review demonstrated that different chemical, biological, and physical pretreatment technologies improve the biomethane potential (BMP) and potentially affect the dominant bacteria and archaea. Moreover, although hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis are more observed due to resistance to extreme conditions, methane production follows both aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic pathways in AD assisted with different pretreatment process. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40201-024-00917-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.