Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464799›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Predicting the sample size of randomized controlled trials using natural language processing.

Paul Windisch, Fabio Dennstädt, Carole Koechli, Robert Förster, Christina Schröder, Daniel M Aebersold, Daniel R Zwahlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul WindischDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1040-4888
Fabio DennstädtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Carole KoechliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Robert FörsterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Christina SchröderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Daniel M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel R ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Extracting the sample size from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains a challenge to developing better search functionalities or automating systematic reviews. Most current approaches rely on the sample size being explicitly mentioned in the abstract. The objective of this study was, therefore, to develop and validate additional approaches. Materials and Methods: 847 RCTs from high-impact medical journals were tagged with 6 different entities that could indicate the sample size. A named entity recognition (NER) model was trained to extract the entities and then deployed on a test set of 150 RCTs. The entities' performance in predicting the actual number of trial participants who were randomized was assessed and possible combinations of the entities were evaluated to create predictive models. The test set was also used to evaluate the performance of GPT-4o on the same task. Results: The most accurate model could make predictions for 64.7% of trials in the test set, and the resulting predictions were equal to the ground truth in 93.8%. GPT-4o was able to make a prediction on 94.7% of trials and the resulting predictions were equal to the ground truth in 90.8%. Discussion: This study presents an NER model that can extract different entities that can be used to predict the sample size from the abstract of an RCT. The entities can be combined in different ways to obtain models with different characteristics. Conclusion: Training an NER model to predict the sample size from RCTs is feasible. Large language models can deliver similar performance without the need for prior training on the task although at a higher cost due to proprietary technology and/or required computational power.

Indexed as

evidence-based medicineGPT-4machine learningnatural language processingrandomized controlled trialtext miningtransformer

Identifiers

PMID39464799
PMCPMC11512142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.