Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464798›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Risk factors for wrong-patient medication orders in the emergency department.

Gert Krummrey, Thomas C Sauter, Wolf E Hautz, Martin Müller, David L B Schwappach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gert KrummreyInstitute for Medical Informatics (I4MI), Bern University of Applied Sciences (BFH), Biel/Bienne 2501, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-2336
Thomas C SauterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
Wolf E HautzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
Martin MüllerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
David L B SchwappachInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This paper investigates the risk factors for wrong-patient medication orders in an emergency department (ED) by studying intercepted ordering errors identified by the "retract-and-reorder" (RaR) metric (orders that were retracted and reordered for a different patient by the same provider within 10 min). Materials and Methods: Medication ordering data of an academic ED were analyzed to identify RaR events. The association of RaR events with similarity of patient names and birthdates, matching sex, age difference, the month, weekday, and hour of the RaR event, the elapsed hours since ED shift start, and the proximity of exam rooms in the electronic medical record (EMR) dashboard's layout was evaluated. Results: Over 5 years (2017-2021), 1031 RaR events were identified among a total of 561 099 medication orders leading to a proportional incidence of 184 per 100 000 ED orders (95% CI: 172; 195). RaR orders were less likely to be performed by nurses compared to physicians (OR 0.54 [0.47; 0.61], Discussion and Conclusion: This study found no significant influence from factors such as similarity of patient names, age, or birthdates. However, the proximity of exam rooms in the user interface of the EMR as well as patients' same sex emerged as risk factors.

Indexed as

electronic medical records (EMRs)emergency medicinemedication errorretract-and-reorder (RaR)

Identifiers

PMID39464798
PMCPMC11512145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.