Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464797›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Assessing the impact of social determinants of health on diabetes severity and management.

Xiyu Ding, Hadi Kharrazi, Akihiko Nishimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SDoH-GPT: using large language models to extract social determinants of health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiyu DingBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Hadi KharraziBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Akihiko NishimuraDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-2513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Adverse Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are considered major obstacles to effective management of type-2 diabetes. This study aims to quantify the impact of SDoH factors on diabetes management outcomes. Materials and Methods: We quantified the joint impact of multiple SDoH by applying a self-control case series method-which accounts for confounding by using individuals as their own control-to electronic health record data from an academic health system in Maryland. Results: We found a consistent increase in HbA1c levels associated with SDoH across alternative study designs. The estimated total contributions of SDoH ranged 0.014-0.065 across the alternative designs. Transportation issues demonstrated particularly significant contributions, with estimates of 0.077-0.144. When assuming SDoH's risk window to be ±45 days, for example, the total contribution was estimated to be 0.065 (95% CI [0.010, 0.120]) increase in HbA1c and the transportation issues' contribution 0.134 (95% CI [0.020, 0.249]). Discussion and Conclusion: Our result suggests that reducing transportation barriers may be an effective SDoH intervention strategy for diabetes management; however, the clinical impact of such interventions warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

HbA1cself-controlled study designsocial determinants of healthtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39464797
PMCPMC11512144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.