ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Research Trends of Specialty Nurse Training from 2003 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core competencies and training needs of specialist-nurse clinical educators: a latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Research Progress and Trends in Exercise Interventions for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Bibliometric Visualization Analysis Using CiteSpace.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze research trends, frontiers, and hot topics in specialty nurse training over the past 20 years, and provide a reference for researchers to understand the current research landscape in this field. Methods: Studies from the core collection of Web of Science were used. Furthermore, CiteSpace 6.3 R3 was utilized to analyze information on country, institution, authors, keywords and burst words. Results: A total of 296 articles were included in the analysis. The United States had the highest number of articles, and there was limited cooperation between authors and institutions. The research hotspots in this field included "clinical education models for specialist nurses", "APN role training", and "interprofessional education". Conclusion: The future research trend is to explore the effective integration of training models suitable for different regions and cultural backgrounds and cross-professional education models. It is suggested that researchers pay attention to the innovation and development of specialized nursing clinical practice under different cultural backgrounds, and strengthen international exchanges and cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.