ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Effects of intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) monotherapy in central retinal vein occlusion in young subjects.
Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-angiogenic agent Bevacizumab in central retinal venous occlusion treatment. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of Bevacizumab and ophthalmological parameters such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in central retinal venous occlusion in patients aged less than 30. Methods: This is a prospective, interventional study, done on 25 eyes of 25 patients aged 30 years and below with central retinal venous occlusion, who received intravitreal Bevacizumab injections for three consecutive months. The mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography were compared and correlated at baseline after 3 months and 6 months follow-up. Results: The mean best corrected visual acuity and the central macular thickness on OCT improved significantly from 1.08±0.29 and 454.80±114.5µm at baseline to 0.77±0.32 logMAR units and 339.7±82.5µm after 6 months follow up. Conclusion: The current study showed that intravitreal Bevacizumab at a dose of 1.25 mg and with strict control of systemic contributory parameters seemed to improve BCVA and CMT and macular edema measured at baseline to 3 months and 6 months follow-up after three consecutive monthly injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.