Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464722›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical extended reality2024

Psychological Underpinnings of Trust and Privacy Perception in the Medical Metaverse.

Susan Persky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical extended reality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susan PerskySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-5744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea of a medical metaverse highlights the ways that immersive technologies will provide direct experiential access to the future of digital medicine, enabling clinical interactions, therapeutic treatment, and access to educational and support resources in persistent, multi-user, immersive digital environments. There are several points of tension, however, between the need for trust and privacy in the medical context and established norms and capabilities of the digital platforms on which health care is expected to increasingly take place. Considering trust and privacy experiences though a psychological lens, focused on tendencies, norms, and expectancies within digital environments can be instructive in considering these challenges. Here, the interface between human psychology and visions for the medical metaverse are discussed in the context of the environment, the self, interpersonal interactions, and group dynamics. Incorporating well-established psychological principles into user-centric design of future medical metaverse applications can enable us to take full advantage of emerging technological capabilities while building our digital interface with the future of medicine that is psychologically and ethically sound.

Indexed as

immersive technologymedicineprivacypsychology

Identifiers

PMID39464722
PMCPMC11512158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.