Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464642›Full record

ReviewCurrent forestry reports2024

From Industry 5.0 to Forestry 5.0: Bridging the gap with Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.

Andreas Holzinger, Janine Schweier, Christoph Gollob, Arne Nothdurft, Hubert Hasenauer, Thomas Kirisits, Carola Häggström, Rien Visser, Raffaele Cavalli, Raffaele Spinelli and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current forestry reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andreas HolzingerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Janine SchweierSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph GollobUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arne NothdurftUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hubert HasenauerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas KirisitsUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Carola HäggströmSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rien VisserUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Raffaele CavalliUniversity of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Raffaele SpinelliCNR IBE, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Karl StampferUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of the Review: Recent technological innovations in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have successfully revolutionized many industrial processes, enhancing productivity and sustainability, under the paradigm of Industry 5.0. It offers opportunities for the forestry sector such as predictive analytics, automation, and precision management, which could transform traditional forest operations into smart, effective, and sustainable practices. The paper sets forth to outline the evolution from Industry 5.0 and its promising transition into Forestry 5.0. The purpose is to elucidate the status of these developments, identify enabling technologies, particularly AI, and uncover the challenges hindering the efficient adoption of these techniques in forestry by presenting a framework. Recent Findings: However, the gap between potential and practical implementation is primarily due to logistical, infrastructural, and environmental challenges unique to the forestry sector. The solution lies in Human-Centered AI, which, unlike the Industry 4.0 paradigm, aims to integrate humans into the loop rather than replace them, thereby fostering safe, secure, and trustworthy Human-AI interactions. Summary: The paper concludes by highlighting the need for Human-Centered AI development for the successful transition to Forestry 5.0 - where the goal is to support the human workers rather than substituting them. A multidisciplinary approach involving technologists, ecologists, policymakers, and forestry practitioners is essential to navigate these challenges, leading to a sustainable and technologically advanced future for the forestry sector. In this transformation, our focus remains on ensuring a balance between increased productivity, nature conservation and social licence, worker safety and satisfaction.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceForest managementForestry 5.0Human-Centered AI

Identifiers

PMID39464642
PMCPMC11499417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.