ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2024
Intensity of pain during coronary interventions via the radial artery.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Pain Management With Combined EMLA Patch and Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Transradial Angiography.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Bilateral 360-degree radial loops in a patient with inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radial access reduces vascular complications compared to femoral access. Various factors may influence the patient's pain during coronary intervention. Aim: To assess what clinical and periprocedural factors affect discomfort and pain intensity during angiography via the radial artery without use of spasmolytics. Material and methods: A group of 238 patients (M/F 142/96, mean age: 67 ±10 years) who underwent coronary angiography and interventions through the radial artery approach was studied. Every patient had ultrasound assessment of the radial artery. Pain was assessed according to the numerical pain rating scale, where mild pain is 1-3, moderate pain is 4-7, and severe pain is above 7. Results: We included 238 patients. Most of the participants had a low pain level ( Conclusions: In our study we analyzed possible factors which may contribute to the severe pain sensation during percutaneous coronary intervention. We found that masculine gender, greater weight and height as well as diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction diagnosis on admission correlated with lower pain level. Conversely, greater maximal and minimal diameters of the radial artery correlated with stronger pain level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.